Commented Unassigned: Soundness issue with

The following code proves false:

```
predicate P(i:int) { true }

lemma Tester()
{
// forall i ensures false ==> P(i) {}
forall i ensures P(i) <== false {}
assert forall i :: P(i) ==> false;
assert P(0);
assert false;
}
```

There may be a translation issue with <== in some situations, because the equivalent version with ==> (commented out in the code above) fails, as it should.
Comments: Chris notes that the problem is that the resolver handles left implication (explication) by swapping the arguments and then treating it like a regular implication. The problem above appears to be caused by the Cloner, which swaps the arguments again, leaving the implication going in the wrong direction.